Review Petition 794/2010 Kerala High Court

Saturday, 18 September 2010 10:37

Attention: open in a new window. PDFPrint

QPMPA Kerala

Letter to the Drugs Controller

Registered  

21 September 2010

To,

The Drugs Controller,
Office of the Drugs Controller, Red Cross Road,
Thiruvananthapuram 695035

Sub: Review Petition (RP No. 794/2010) — in WP (C) 38494/2003 — reg.

Dear Sir,

Your kind attention is invited to the fact that the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala on 20 September 2010 admitted RP No. 794/2010 to review judgment in WP (C) No. 38494/2003.

The Review Petition was admitted after hearing the Govt. Pleader who took time to file a Counter Affidavit.

I request you to refrain from taking any coercive steps to implement the order directing hospitals to take Drug Licence since the matter is subjudice.

Thanking you and with regards,

Yours sincerely,

Sd/-

Kishore Kumar (State Secretary, QPMPA) 

cc.       The Chief Secretary, Kerala
             The Health Secretary, Kerala


Dear Members,

Our case Review Petition No. 794/2010 is posted for hearing on 20.9.2010.

We can expect a stay order on 20th itself. Thank you for the cooperation.

My special thanks to Adv. Sreekumar also.

Kishore Kumar

Press release by Punalur Branch - 29.9.10

Anchal1

Anchal2

Dear Friends,

Stay Order to Drug Stores

As per the orders of Pathanathitta Munisiff Court dated 13.9.2010 in IA 2125/2010 four medical stores in that area is directed not to stop supply of drugs to the Petitioner.
However, you are at liberty to approach them for the required drugs. The Phone No. Bigfield - 04682223138, Karthika 04692601095 and Unique 04692604406.

Contact them and they will deliver the drugs to your door steps.

Kindly Blacklist all the drug stores that cooperated with the Drugs Control authorities and their Oral orders. There are people who do not accept things orally.

 

Kishore

Courtorderpathanamthitta


 

The Causelist of Kerala High Court copied.

 You can get the full list by visiting http://causelists.nic.in/kerala/omon/cl.html

 

HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

DAILY CAUSE LIST

(For 20th, September, 2010 )

 

COURT ROOM. "01"

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.J.CHELAMESWAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN
ADMISSION - PART I 
==================

1. RP 794/2010                           SRI.S.SREEKUMAR
                         
     WPC.38494/2003(G)             SRI.P.MARTIN JOSE
                       
         & IA 478/2010                   SRI.P.PRIJITH
                            
                                                    SRI.S.VAIDYANATHAN/
                     
                                                    SERVED ON - GOVERNMENT PLEADER(NO MEMO)
                                                    SERVED ON - SRI.T.P.M.IBRAHIM KHAN,ASST.S.G OF INDI(NO
                                                    SERVED ON - SRI.S.EASWARAN(NO MEMO)
                                                    SERVED ON - SRI.M.CHANDRABOSE (NO MEMO)
             

2. WA 2882/2009                   SRI.S.SUDHEESHKAR

For more on Drug Licence issue visit --

 

http://www.qpmpa.org/news-and-events/9-drug-licence-case.html

Drug Licence Case

Articles:

 

 

1

Why a declaration by an RMP?

2

Treat drugged Drugs Inspectors

3

Pharmabiz News articles

4

Pharmabiz Editorial & News

5

Bureaucratic Terrorism - 3rd September

6

IMA Pepsi issue

7

Press Release 29 August 2010

8

Drugs Controller finally acted!

9

Hospital Drug Licence & Pharmacists

10

IMA vs. QPMPA — Part 5 — The Double role of IMA

11

IMA vs. QPMPA — Part 4 — Emails

12

IMA vs. QPMPA - Part 3 - Minutes

13

IMA vs. QPMPA - Part 2 - IMA Letters in May 2010

14

IMA vs. QPMPA — Part 1 — The Kickoff

15

Court proceedings on 2.8.10 -- confidential

16

Protect Drugs & Pharmacy Acts of India — Press Release

17

SLP2

18

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION

19

Judgment

20

The Story

21

Doctors and Drug License

Comments  

 
#3 Doctor — 2010-09-30 04:44
In the case of a single RMP, even as per the present situation, he is exempted from all the section of chapter IV of the drug act (he has to permit the so called inspectors to “see” the purchase records only). Who is the inspector? What is his power? What action he can take? What are the sections under which a person can be punished as per the drug act? Etc. is mentioned in the chapter IV of the said act. Being exempted from all the sections of chapter IV, the said inspectors, his power, the actions that can be taken and various punishments are not valid in front of an RMP. If they come to raid the institution of an RMP, it can be considered only as a “gundayisam”. So, as an immediate protection of health and wealth of an RMP, he can manhandle the “gundas” who attack him. If he himself alone cannot withstand against those “Gundas” he can seek the help of others (securities: they are for that purpose)
Quote
 
 
#2 doctor — 2010-09-29 18:08
The only solution is to manhandle those officers if they enter in to your hospital without the permission. You can utilize your staff (security staff or peons or anyone else) for this purpose. They have the moral responsibility to safeguard their organization. If the issue turn in to a legal matter, don’t worry, nothing is going to happen as it is happening inside your hospital. No one will be prepared to give evidence in the court. The result will be the same as in the case of usual “hospital attack”. No one will be punished. If it comes in to the court, we can fight it out. Don’t give them the evidence as medicines or any signed papers from your side. The officers will be only two or four in numbers. It will be easy to manhandle them.
Quote
 
 
#1 doctor — 2010-09-29 18:07
The only solution is to manhandle those officers if they enter in to your hospital without the permission. You can utilize your staff (security staff or peons or anyone else) for this purpose. They have the moral responsibility to safeguard their organization. If the issue turn in to a legal matter, don’t worry, nothing is going to happen as it is happening inside your hospital. No one will be prepared to give evidence in the court. The result will be the same as in the case of usual “hospital attack”. No one will be punished. If it comes in to the court, we can fight it out. Don’t give them the evidence as medicines or any signed papers from your side. The officers will be only two or four in numbers. It will be easy to manhandle them.
Quote
 

Add comment

You have to login to post comments

Security code
Refresh